Employment Law- Anne Marie Grozdanich V. Leisure Hills Health Center

Anne Marie Grozdanich vs . waste Hills CenterNameClass , SectionProfessor NameOctober 29 , 2005Anne Marie Grozdanich vs . Leisure Hills CenterHas in that location been cud master quo /tangible art action tortureNeither term substructure be applied to this model . Quid pro quo , or mutual consideration , is an exchange of valuables amidst parties , wherein each party has something to divulge and pay off . In this case , the plaintiff Anne , was non presented with an draw out for exchange of valuables , the valuable being in this case versed gratification in exchange for Anne s usageTangible employment action torment has been outlined by the U .S compulsive court in 2003 . According to The Court , tangible employment action harassment constitutes a significant change in employment term . such as hiring , firing , failing to promote , reassignment with importantly different responsibilities , or a conclusion causing a significant change in benefits (Starr and Strauss , 2003 . In the case presented , of these actions occurredHas in that location been a hostile locomote environsAfter start-off reading of this case , the initial answer would be yes there simply must be a hostile work environment . Upon proximate examination , however , this question start outs sooner interesting . A hostile work environment , at its very rudimentary level , includes perennial cast-off(prenominal) demand , sexual or other(a)wise . In this case , the term un postulateed becomes exceedingly important . Assuming for a moment that the on the wholeeged allegations and so took place , a hostile work environment cannot be established because the complainant did not express that either deportment was unwanted , leaving fourth dimension for it to become a repeated unwanted offenseThe complain ant avoided the situation until it progresse! d into greater offensive behaviorsWas Leisure Hills investigation adequateThe investigating was quick , alone not unlined in its timing . Swift to discourse both the complainant and alleged harasser , the comp both hold a sidereal day to interview potential reck anes , therefore leaving time for cardinal or both of the parties to deformity the memories of the pick upes Furthermore , the time left-hand(a) between the interviews could contain in any case served to further distort the memories of the witness because of the clear dislike between parties . In addition to the witness problem there were completely two , in-house , police detectives , both of whom could be swayed by past events and in-person feelingsIn to conduct this investigation at its skillfulest capacity , there should have been at least one outside , impartial investigator . In addition , all interviews should have been conducted on the kindred day without much time lapsing between interviewsWhat , if any , disciplinary or other remedial actions should Leisure Hills payoffThe negligible actions The Leisure Hills Center should take are as followsTheresa Harding should receive a written specimen concerning her disregard for company polity . Harding fully admitted she suggested to the complainant to tho avoid Parson . Harding neer suggested to the complainant that she should a kick with management , which is company policyParsons should be removed from his post and reassigned or terminated Parsons showed little compassionateness for the complainant . If his behavior was real innocent , he would not...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay