US actions in Vietnam The two viewpoints in the book, ?Opposing Veiwpoints in American History? were astir(predicate) the US actions in the Vietnam. Were they confirm or not? harmonize to Lyndon B. rearson U.S. actions were justified. Johnson became president after the blackwash of John F. Kennedy. The conflict in Vietnam was already in Vietnam when Johnson took over. A prof of history at United States International University in San Diego, raw Hum Kim, has a different viewpoint about the contend. He felt that US actions were not justified and were bad flawed.
Ac cording to President Johnson (1965), the U.S. fought for many reasons. The object of struggle is ? add up conquest?, and the outcome is the works of peace. (pg. 289) He felt war was necessary to help save many people from barbaric assassinations and kidnappings. Many woman and children were victims because their men were loyal to their government. Communism was gentle over. ?We are the...If you want to get a full essay, vow it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.