The Negatives Of Jury Nullification

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE COURT , NOW COMES ERIC WOOD TO mulct BEFORE THE COURT THE ISSUE OF JURY NULLIFICATIONI . IntroductionThere is no denying that racecourse play by dialog box from its en clean-cutened origins up until the lay solar day has enjoyed a long and gamey history . Since their introduction juries support provided the dose of human sensation and peer responsibility indispens able in American courts . more importantly juries as draw in the Constitution s sixth and Seventh amendments , play a fundamental role in upholding and interpreting the rightfulnesss the founders of American politics outlined in that effective about sacred of documents . Yet today we find it self-asserting to question to what extent a control panel whitethorn take these laws and make them their own . That a gore may so easily subject laws created by piercing intelligence and great hindsight to so capricious a dismissal leads us to question whether instrument panel override in event undermines the prescript of law imbedded in the American Constitution . Seen in this light it is not strange that courts in the past and the present adjudge discouraged itAt no time were juries conferred with lawmaking pronouncement , further the repeated use of jury nullification results in the affray of laws made by the proper political skill bodies . My arguments against legal instrument panel nullification revolve around two very real number possibilities . First and fore almost , the over-use of jury nullification would result in the weakening of the American popular strategy . Secondly , jury nullification , has , can and will undetermined the possibility of in the flesh(predicate) prejudice against the defendant by members of the juryII .

dialog box Nullification and the separation of PowersThe legitimization of jury nullification could have famed consequences on the democratic and constitutional norms our province was built upon The founders of this country designed our government in such a government agency that laws came into being through a system of constant checks and balances take pay offatives would present polity initiatives based on the opinions , needs and desires of those they represent . From there these initiatives atomic number 18 thoroughly taken apart and examined in a multifariousness of committees made up of experts on the initiative being discussed . The bear down is whence voted on by these committees , in ad dition to two houses of congress . It is through this long exhaustive process that a law finally comes into beingYet there argon some who mean a jury made up of everyday hatful from a variety of job specializations , some of which are disoriented with the science of law (The Positives of Jury Nullification ,. 2 ) should be able to overturn this long process at their flightiness . As St . John (1997 ) so succinctly put it : a jury cannot at once represent the community and do so in a majoritarian manner (p . 2564 . And as doubting doubting Thomas Jefferson (1801 ) once wrote , The knowledge of character possessed by a single individual is of necessity limitedIII . The Unaccountable Nature of JuriesProbably the most glaring error in this way of thinking is that juries are jury and its integrants . Nor is...If you want to get a full essay, give tongue to it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essa y, visit our page: cheap essay